"Love Bite"

The seaside can be a fun place to visit, fish and chips, a walk on the beach, visit the amusement arcades, and ripped to shreds by a werewolf......

Yes that last one is correct, well it is in Rainmouth, where this latest comedy horror is set. The sleepy seaside town has fallen victim to a lycanthrope.
Jamie (Ed Speleers), who more orless runs his mother's boarding house, hangs around the town with his friends, a motley group of no-hopers, all represented from the nerd, to the cock sure sex mad one. However, Jamie's world takes a turn for the better when Juliana arrives in town, but she is not the only new arrival. Hot on her heels is the very mysterious Sid, looking like a tramp version of Van Helsing.

It transpires that there is indeed a werewolf on the loose, and ripping young virgins to shreds. This worries Jamie considerably as he has yet to lose his cherry. Despite his falling for Juliana, they never seem to be able to find that special moment for some bedroom shananigans. Could the fact that Sid is always shadowing her be a factor? Is she the werewolf terrorising the town? Is Sid a double bluff, and actually the hairy beast himself?  Do we care?  No we bloody don't.

Sadly this is pathetic entry in the genre of British horror, the most horrific thing about the whole effort is that it was commissioned in the first place. One can only assume that Timothy Spall owes the Director or Producer a favour, or did them a favour,as I can see no reason for an actor of his calibre to appear in such drivel.

However, when you see the score, you may wonder why it is as high as it is. The answer is simple, you get to see Ed Speleers naked, (no frontal) and yes it is worth seeing for that alone, and yes I am that shallow.....sorry folks

All hair and no bite.........4 out of 10

"Looper"

I said in a recent review for the Joseph Gordon-Levitt film "Premium Rush" that I hoped that "Looper" would restore our faith in his ability to pick pleasing film projects....after watching "Looper" our faith is well and truly restored.

I will endeavour to do my best in describing the plot of the movie, without hopefully making it sound too complicated.
In the year 2074, time travel is a possibility, however it has been declare illegal, as the criminal fraternity have been using the process for the own gain. To put a stop to the use of time travel, a team has been assembled, and they send those caught time travelling back in time 30 years, where a looper is waiting to kill the criminal and dispose of the body.
'Joe' is one of the team of loopers who has this task. The team was assembled by 'Abe' who has come back in time with the necessary know how to put it all into practice.

The only problem for Joe is that his latest victim is his future self, not an uncommon practice, but still it can be unsettling for the looper, and some are not always able to carry out the hit. And that very sutuation happens here, so now we have two Joes to contend with. Each having their own agenda. Older Joe has travelled back to deal with 'the Rainmaker' a terrorist running riot in his time, his aim to travel back and kick him but as a child.

The stories being told by the respective characters are all equally compelling. We get a wonderful look at the future, beautifully recreated, in both visual effects, and also production design.  The stories all start to converge when the three main protagonists meet on a farm, run by Sara, a young mother, whose Son has some unique abilities. Could he be 'the rainmaker'?  One thing is for certain, is that it builds to a very memorable finale.

All performances in the film are great, but I have to give a special mention to Pierce Gagnon, who plays 'Cid', the young boy. He is truly amazing, at times moving, and then other times he is truly chilling. For such a young actor to this give this level of performance is remarkable.

Yes there are plot holes in the film the size of the national debt in Greece, but for anyone who loves fantasy of science fiction, this is a film to be loved, as they seldom get as good as this. A real delight to watch.......9 out of 10.

"Paranormal Activity 4"

Quite frankly I do not propose to spend a lot of time on this review, as (a) I am a tad behind with reviews, (b) the film is dire and not worth my time.

All you need to know is that the baby abducted at the end of the first film reappears, now living in a new neighbourhood, with his mysterious 'mother', and befriends a family over the road. Strange things start to happen to the family whenever the boy visits, all the usual stuff, and this normally would be a good thing, as the one thing I have found with this series of movies, is that it does chilling very well. Alas there had to be an exception, and this is that very exception.

The advent of the webcam brings a new dimension to this film, but it is prolonged, and the characters mainly involved with the webcam are not that engaging. The film does also seem to stretch credibility in why the use of a video camera is being used so much.

After three really entertaining and chilling movies, the first dud in the series, and given that a fifth film has been green lit, let us hope that it is the last.......4 out of 10

"Skyfall"

After 50 years, and 22 movies, the legacy that is secret agent James Bond 007 looks like here is going to be with us for a good while longer, with the release of the 23rd film in the franchise, "Skyfall".

As many of you will know, this film looks at the relationship between Bond and 'M', and has to look at the consequences for the latter character as her past comes back to haunt her.
The film opens in great style with 007 trying to receive a hard drive which contains the names and aliases of agents working undercover in terrorist organisations. During the Op. Bond is shot at, and presumed dead.
Meanwhile, MI6 is under attack, and from someone very close to home. M is without her best agent, and sees her very future in jeopardy with the loss of the hard-drive. An early retirement is in the pipeline as Ministers are after her blood.
But it would seem that the reports of 007's dead are a little premature, and with a deadly attack on MI6 iteself, it sees Bond return to the UK and help 'M' with the investigation. What they uncover is a trail that leads 007 to Shanghai. He encounters the stunningly beautiful 'Severine', and Bond is keen to meet her employer. Bond is taken to a deserted island, and comes face to face with 'Silva' the mastermind behind the attack on MI6, the theft of the hard-drive, but more importantly, has a personal vendetta against 'M'.
Unfortunately for 'Silva' he soon finds himself back in the UK, and in the hands of the security services for the crimes that he has committed. There is a reckoning between he and 'M' and it becomes clear that 'Silva' is a former MI6 officer, and he was left to rot in the East when there was a trade off, and he blames 'M' for his incarceration, and subsequent torture. And has a score to settle. So alas nothing has gone to plan.....or has it?  Could it be that this is what he planned all along?

Whilst 'M' battles the bureaucrats, 'Silva' makes his escape from his cell. And wreaks havoc in London, especially on the Underground. 'Silva' makes his way to the Hearing that has 'M' in attendence, his plan is to end the life of the woman he blames for his misery.  There is an inpressive shoot-out, and things are still unresolved. Knowing that 'Silva' always seems to have the upper hand with his expertise in all things relating to the web, Bond decides to even the playing field. And sets things for the big finale, at a location that really does pay homage to the history of James Bond 007.

After the justified lukewarm reception that was received by "Quantum of Solace", it is wonderful to see that the Producers have pulled out all the stops to ensure that the film charged with celebrating the Golden anniversary of 007 has the very best talents involved.
Daniel Craig has settled brilliantly into the role of James Bond, silencing those critics when he was first announced. One does not doubt for a moment that here is a letahl killing machine, and man who will kill without a moments hesitation. But it is not all killing, he has also wonderfully displayed a sense of vulnerability that Bond needs, whether it is falling in love with 'Vesper Lynd' or the clearly evident love and respect he has for 'M', Bond is not all about death and destruction. The commitment that Craig has to the role can be no better be illustrated than by the physical element, especially when it comes to the many action scenes in the film. His involvement with the many stunts and action sequences is to be commended from the highest level. His performance as 'Bond' has grown over the past few years, and it is such a pleasure to see him on screen as 007, a role that has made him, for me, the best actor to play the role, since the film series began back in 1962.
What can once possibly say about Dame Judi Dench that has not already been said a thousand times over? She has made the role of 'M' her own. I doubt few thought it possible that anyone could surpass Bernard Lee as the much put upon head of the Double O section. But this truly amazing actress has taken a character that we sometimes only get a fleeting glimpse of, and made us fall in love with her, in the same way I guess that she has with James, or rather a deep affection that she has for him, and he very much has for her.
From the number cruncher we were first introduced to in "GoldenEye", to the beloved Section Head we have in "Skyfall", it is constantly a pleasure to see Dame Judi Dench on screen, and here with her biggest role to date, as her past comes back to wreak a terrible revenge.

Javier Bardem is one of the finest actors in Europe, even the world, and has of late carved quite the niche for himself playing villains. Who could forget his Oscar winning performance in "No Country For Old Men"?  So naturally he was the perfect choice to play 'Silva' a man hell bent on seeking recompence for his pain suffered whilst imprisoned, and blaming 'M' for his downfall. A blonde Bond and now we have a Blonde Bond Villain, well they do say that Blondes have more fun, and most certainly seem to do here. 'Silva' certainly does like to have fun with 007, judging from a rather close encounter. At times softly spoken, with more than a gleam in his eye, Bardem makes 'Silva' one of the most menancing Bond villains we have seen for some time. I know that long gone are the days when we have a villain who wants to take over the world, but 'Silva' is quite the piece of work, and the fact that his goal is a single individual, for me makes him even more dangerous. And like, Dench, it is a delight watching Bardem on screen in a quite brilliant performance. At times it is such a quiet, understated performance, chilling, and there is a moment when he does something that could rival 'Hannibal Lector'.
I could go on at length about the other cast members, but am aware of how long this review is already. Ben Wishaw makes a delightful debut as 'Q', the youthful adolescent, barely looking old enough to buy a lottery ticket, brings the character right up to date, especially with the Cyber threat affecting MI6, it takes a younger man with the knowledge of Computers to go into battle. I look forward to seeing more of him in the role in the next film.
Another actor who could well be returning is Ralph Fienes, who plays 'Mallory', an MI6 official. Naomie Harris and Berenice Mahlohe provide the glamour in the film, and two stunningly beautiful ladies they are too.Harris especially does shine as fellow agent 'Eve'.
And of course one could not discuss the cast without mentioning the legend that is Albert Finney. So wonderful to see him back on the big screen after a virtual retirement. (I am not counting his barely noticable appearance in "The Bourne Legacy"). As ever he is a delight to watch, providing the film with a touch of humour, and an all round lovely performance in the role he plays.

It was quite a surprise when Sam Mendes was announced as being given the Director's chair for this latest 007 movie. One would not normally associate him with this kind of film. He certainly has a knack for hiring the very best talent to work on his movies, but would he have the capability to take on the much tougher challenge of directing a James Bond film?  The answer is so obviously yes. A man with the immense of talent of Sam Mendes would certainly be upto to that challenge, but he has well and truly surpassed it, creating the best Bond film in 13 years, and possibly one that will stand the test of time as one of the very best Bond films ever.

The photography in Bond films of late, it would be fair to say, have come under attack, and quite rightly so. The creative team have tried too hard to compete with other action films, and it has made some scenes virtually unwatchable. I knew we would not have that problem with this film as Director Sam Mendes hires just the best Cinematographers in the business, which is why so many of his films are Oscar nominated for Cinematography. With "Skyfall" he has hired fellow Brit and 9 nine Oscar nominee Roger Deakins, one of the most respected DP's there is. And he does a most remarkable job. I cannot recall a Bond film that has been better shot, or looked more beautiful, or give the feeling that it has been shot with a passion. Such an excellent job has been done here.

Bond composer regular David Arnold is sadly missing from this new film, although Thomas Newman does a great job of writing the score. There are some classic Bond music moments in the movie, and I would have no objection to seeing Mr. Newman compose another 007 score in the future.
Daniel Kleinman is back working in the opening title sequence, and coupled with that is the beautifully haunting theme song from Adele, making the opening title sequence for "Skyfall", for me, the best in the last 50 years, and that is saying something.

I could go on for longer, but am keen to post this review. Just know that every box has been ticked, the acting, directing, photography, editing, costumes, music, action sequences, so much love and affection from every department is evident in this 23rd James Bond film.
I have seen the film three times so far, and hope to see it a few more yet. It really is that good, Bond films have rarely been as great as this. Believe the reviews, they do not lie. This is Bond at his very best.

As this is the year of the Bond's 50th, just a little thank you to Ian Fleming, Albert R. Broccoli, Harry Saltzman and Sean Connery......four men instrumental in this anniversary year we celebrate.

The Sky may fall, but Bond does not.......10 out of 10


HAPPY ANNIVERSARY JAMES BOND - 007

"Raiders of the Lost Ark"

The Man With Hat is back in his original adventure...

A wonderful opportunity to see that great Spielberg movie on the big screen, and on the IMAX, and a brand new print. 

I won't begin to bore you with the plot, as I am sure that just about the World and his wife have seen the movie at least a dozen times, and know the plot inside out.

Just to say that seeing Harrison Ford as archeologist 'Indiana Jones' is a real delight, this first film is by far the best, having ticked all the boxes. From that fantastic opening in the South American caves with Jones trying to outrun a huge boulder, to his tracking down the 'Well of Souls' and then the unveiling of the Ark of the Covenant.

The action comes thick and fast with some truly wonderous set pieces, the score from John Williams is amongst some of his best work, the cinematography and editing are a delight to see, and the cast all excel, but I have to give a special mention to Ronald Lacey who played 'Toht', the rather evil Nazi, just a delight watching him on screen, he really does scare the bejesus out of one.

Does not get much better than this.......9 out of 10

"The Sweeney"

Regan and Carter are back....

Those kindly gentlemen from the Flying Squad, are back on the big screen, with a new interpretation. Long gone are the flares and scowls of John Thaw and Dennis Waterman. Instead we are right bang up to date with probably the toughest actor on screen, namely Ray Winstone, and a young man who is really maiking a name for himself cinematically, and he is Ben Drew.

A robbery in a Jewellers goes wrong, and an innocent shopper is shot and killed. The team are determined to bring to justice those behind the killing. Regan is convinced that his regular Crime Boss, 'Allen' is behind the job.
They arrest and question him, but in the end they have to let him go due to a lack of evidence. Their attention soon moves to an Eastern European criminal. But could it be that the two are working together?

Pressure however is being applied to the Flying Squad from those up above, due to the methods that they sometimes operate to when catching criminals. The costs of their operations are escalating, and it is being noticed. It probably does not help matters that 'Lewis' who is investigating the Flying Squad, his wife is sleeping with 'Regan', so not the best of situations.

Will they get their man or men even?
The film is ok, the main thought that went through my mind was that Cinema did not seem to be the ideal medium for this film. It could have easily been done as a television series, like the original, and probably would have been better suited.
There are indeed some excellent set pieces, most notably the shoot out in Trafalgar Square.

I can't quite put my finger on what was wrong with the film, there probably is not that much wrong, its just that film was average. Nothing to make it stand out. Damian Lewis who is riding high after the smash success of "Homeland" is woefully underused, blink at times and you miss him.

After his directing debut hit with "Ill Manors" the one saving grace in the film is Ben Drew who gives a decent performance as 'Carter', making the character believable and you really take to him.

Good but maybe a smaller screen would have been better......6 out of 10

"Premium Rush"

A new thriller from the Director of that very excellent chiller "Stir of Echoes" and starring one of the best leading young men in Hollywood, Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

A match made in heaven?
You must be bloody kidding. This is a dire mess of a film.
Levitt plays a biking courier. Need something there is a hurry then he is your man. For he can navigate his way around New York with great skill and ease. He may seem a little out of sorts, as he has been dumped by girlfriend, for a biking colleague. Ouch.

He sent to a local University where he is given an envelope, and an address. So off he cycles. This is where his problems begin. For also keen to get their hands on the envelope, is gambling debt ridden Cop 'Bobby Monday' played by Michael Shannon. It could be the answer to all his money woes. So a chase begins on the streets.

But to be honest, do we give a toss?  No we most certainly do not. The plot is dreadful, the characters are poorly written, the cast don't seem to care either, giving truly terrible performances. There are some nicely executed moments with the bikes, but these nowhere near compensate for what we have to ensure in the way of plot.
Michael Shannon has a painfully awful character to bring to life, and deserves far better. And as for Levitt, well after such a great job in "The Dark Knight Rises", he has definitely come down to Earth with a bump. Let us hope that his forthcoming release "Looper" will restore our faith in him.

All concerned should have known better, and stayed well clear of this turkey......3 out of 10

"To Rome With Love"

Woody Allen is back with his latest movie, here we see the various story strands of several characters all who are in the Italian city of love.

There are the parents of 'Hayley' arriving in town for their daughter's forthcoming marriage to a local Italian man, 'Leopoldo' who is thrust into the limelight to become the next greatest celebrity though he has no idea why, a newly married couple, with the husband desperate to impress his family who could further his career, an Architect revisiting his past, and a possible trio of love entanglements when three friends get together.

It was a great pleasure to this movie on the big screen, it having been a staggering 7 years since I last saw an Allen film at the cinema. Much to my shame I did not see the masterpiece that is "Midnight In Paris" at the cinema, and I still greatly regret it.

This is a good Allen, but it has to be said it is not his best work. The comedy is there, but at times rather thin on the ground. I have noticed that quite often the best Allen films are the ones that he just writes and directs. This could well be the case here. I mean look at how successful "Midnight In Paris" was, also with "Bullets over Broadway", and contrary to popular opinion, I am a big fan of "Match Point".

Again it is clear that Hollywood is keen to work with Allen, assembling a great cast, Begnigni is especially wonderful as the bewildered celebrity. It examines what it is like to be a nobody and then to have the world at your feet.

I suppose given that Woody Allen has made about 40 films is as many years, to still be producing films of this calibre is remarkable.
One cannot expect a "Midnight In Paris" every time........6 out of 10

"The Bourne Legacy"

The 'Bourne' series is back.....well kind of.

Given the fact that Paul Greengrass was not asked back into the Director's chair, and seeing that his mentor would not be with him, Matt Damon promptly jumped ship too.
This left Universal Pictures with a major problem. They have a financially successful franchise, and no-one to helm or star in it. Plus how would they get round the problem of "Where is Jason Bourne"?

They hired "Bourne" screenwriter Tony Gilroy to continue the writing duties but also to take over the Directing duties. One would imagine that given his work on the series of films, that he would be well suited in the job.
Instead of hiring another actor to fill the almighty shoes of Matt Damon, the writing team depart from the Robert Ludlum novels, and create a scenario where 'Bourne' was one of several operatives who work on secret missions for the Government. Hence the character of 'Aaron Cross' arrives, and duly takes over the action duties from 'Jason Bourne'. With the exposing over of the covert operations by a British journalist, it becomes evident to all concerned that the various operations must be brought to a close, and anyone involved must be silenced, one way or the other.

There are some very exciting action set pieces, well executed, and Jeremy Renner does an admirable job of stepping into the lead role in the 'Bourne' series. All that having been said, it just did not work for me am afraid. If it had been a film in its own right, then I would no doubt have loved it, but you cannot watch this without thinking of the outstanding work done by Paul Greengrass and Matt Damon. I had been looking forward to seeing Albert Finney back on the big screen, but for the few seconds we get, it was barely worth waiting for.

Universal were obviously desperate to find a way to keep the series alive, and to all of a sudden find out that there were other operatives, without having there be a mention before, it just reeks of a desperate act. Maybe it would have been better to leave the series. But when a quick buck can be made, then nothing can get in the way of the registers from ringing in more dollars.
The film ambles along, and just when it feels like it is starting to get interesting, the bloody thing finishes. I am sure that there will be a sequel, whether I will go see it remains to be seen, though there are whispers that Universal are keen to unite Bourne and Cross. Could be quite the crowd pleaser.

Bourne but not as we know it.......6 out of 10

"The Imposter"

In 1994 Nicholas Barclay disappeared from the family town. His family heard nothing from him. That is until 3 years later. In Spain the local authorities get a phone call from a tourist who has found a young man, claiming to have been kidnapped. The Spanish Authorities contact the U.S. and with the help of the FBI, it turns out that he could well be the missing Barclay boy......or is he?

In actuality, he was a French man, someone who spends his life pretending to be other people. Who was wanted by INERPOL for several cases of impersonation. He hoped that by pretending to be the missing American boy, he could start himself a new life in the States.

The description of the missing boy, and the appearance of the supposed missing boy did have a few discrepancies. Firstly hair colour was different, then there was the different accent, also why would a blonde 16 year old have a two day beard growth, almost jet black?  And most damning was the question of the his changed eye colour.
These factors did seem to cause the FBI something to question, but not enough it would seem to be overly concerned. The family also seemed to have no worries that this was their returning son.

Were the family so desperate to have son back that they would overlook any possible factors that could give to the fact that this man could be an imposter?
How on earth were the local Authorities and the FBI so incompetent in their duties in making sure that this man was who he claimed to be?

The story is told with a combination of interviews with the family and Bourdin, the French con artrist, and also figures from the Authorities, as well as Family photos, and reconstructions. The film is well put together, but whether it was me missing something, but I just found the whole thing boring. So many Critics have raved about this film, and on 'Rotten Tomatoes' it has a rating of 95%, so hey what do I know.
Towards the end the film takes a turn, and may just make the film worthwhile, in that did the family have an ulterior motive for wanting 'Nicholas' back?....does anything come it?  Well that would be telling, but for me this film did not cut the mustard.

OK, but just felt that something was missing.....5 out of 10

"The Expendables 2"

That motley crew of mostly 80's has beens returns for another action packed outing with "The Expendables 2".

The first film did moderate business at the box office. In their hey day, any one of the lead stars could have doubled the takings had they been at the height of their box office power. But times have changed almost thirty years have passed. The stars are looking older. But can they still walk the walk?

The answer is a resounding yes, they most certainly can.
For me in some respects this movie has something fundamental in common with "The Avengers Assemble ",a film that came out earlier this year. The storyline of the film is of little consequence, as its only purpose is to bring this group of characters together for some action packed fun. At the end of the day you are not paying for an Oscar winning Screenplay, you are paying to see some of biggest action stars of the 1980's together for the first and possibly only time ever. I say first time, as there are the same actors from the first film here again, with a few new additions to the cast.

Church is the man who assigns the missions to Barney Ross and his team of Expendables. Church feels that the team let him down after their previous mission did not go the way he had hoped. And he feels that he is owed one by the group. So he assigns Ross and Co. to venture off to track down a fallen plane, the hold of which contains a safe and within the safe is a device which contains the location of a huge haul of plutonium, and the mission is to get the device before anyone gets their hands on it.
Before we even get to this part of the film, there is a brilliant action packed opening sequence, where the team are sent to retrieve a kidnapped Asian business man, and his rescuer, who has also been kidnapped. Cue a great start to this movie.
As mentioned, there some new names in the cast, ranging in age from a sprightly 22 to a geriatric 72. Though not naming any names.

As one would expect, the plan to obtain the device does not go to plan, and it soon is in the hands of chief villain 'Villain', as played by the Muscles from Brussels himself, Jean-Claude Van Damme. Nice to see him back on screen.
Thankfully the major improvement from the first movie is that both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis are given more screen time. There are also a couple of surprises along the way, both take place within the first 30 minutes of the film.

I have to say that as much as I was looking forward to seeing JCVD on screen, the biggest surprise was Chuck Norris. He is someone that has never really made an impact on me, but he is given a great entrance, and plays his scenes very well. There are some good in film gags, involving several of the actors on screen. This provided quite a bit of humour.

Revenge is sought by The Expendables, I won't explain why, as I do not wish to ruin the film, but this is when the cavalry arrives in the shape of 'Church' played by Bruce Willis, and 'Trench' played by Arnold Schwarzengger. It all leads to a huge shoot-out in an Airport. All the big players are there, armed to the teeth, doing what they do best. And this is what your admission ticket is for. It really is quite a spectacular sequence, brilliantly executed, with a bit of humour, but just seeing these great faces from the 80's, killing everything in sight, one more time. Fantastic.

EXciting.....EXplosive....EXactly what makes a great trip to the Cinema......8 out 10

PS - At the time of writing this review, the film is the second week of its release, and has suffered at the Box Office, but so has every other major film on release in the US. More the timing than the film, but I hope it makes enough money to give Lionsgate and Millenium the incentive to make "The Expendables 3". We so need to see the likes to Wesley Snipes and Steven Seagal in the third film. Fingers crossed.

"The Dark Knight Rises"

It has been 8 years since the death of the District Attourney of Gotham, alledgedly at the hands of 'Batman', but with his death came the 'Harvey Dent Act', a powerful law which gave the Police and the relevant Authorities increased powers to not only convict but incarcerate criminals. As many as a thousand criminals are now behind bars because of this act, and it has made Gotham a much safer city. Surely something to be proud of?

But the act was created through a lie, a act of deceit, and with that deceit there has to be a reckoning. And that reckoning is coming.....in the shape of 'Bane'.
Gotham may be clean of villains, but it has also been clear of both 'Bruce Wayne' and his alter ego 'Batman'. Wayne has become the Howard Hughes of the modern generation. He locks himself away in a quiet wing of the Wayne mansion, rumours circulate as to what he looks like, what his health condition is like. During a Charity event, his safe is broken into by 'Selina Kyle', masquerading as a waitress. Initially it seems she is after a stunning pearl necklace, but her actual intention is to get her hands on the fingerprints of 'Bruce Wayne'.
These fingerprints will be used by shady business John Daggett to cause the ruination of the Wayne Empire. His ultimate aim is to get his hands on the Applied Sciences Division of the Wayne Corporation, and also to obtain a nuclear fusion device. Initially created to be a source of energy, but put on hold by 'Wayne' fearing it could be used for a far deadlier purpose.
But Daggett is merely a front man. The one in charge pulling on the strings is 'Bane', a ruthless, incredibly powerful criminal, intent to see the rich and decadent of Gotham have their wealth redistributed, and barring that he will wipe Gotham from the face of the Earth having converted the fusion power source into a bomb.

With his beloved Gotham at risk once more, and seeing 'Bane' on the horizon, 'Bruce Wayne' knows that his other identity has to return' but the return comes at a cost.
'Batman' attempts to bring down 'Bane' but only finds himself ill prepared, and unable to deal with immense strength, and naturally 'Bane' gets the better of him. He imprisons our fallen hero in the Prison that was his home for many years, leaving to him to rot in a pit of despair.

The pit however will not become a permanant home for the Caped Crusader, and the scene is then set for the ultimate show down between the two masked men.

I have probably made the screenplay sound a lot more complicated than it actually is. It is brilliantly written. Nolan, through the original work of 'Batman' creator Bob Kane, has created some truly memorable characters, all brought to life by the very best in acting talent. You only have to look at some of the many names in the cast, there are many Oscar winners and nominees involved, and though this does not always mean the best acting talent, in this case it clearly does. And though it is hard to single out any from such a distinguished and talented cast, for me there are a few who truly shine bright.
There is Gary Oldman as 'Commissioner Gordon' who brings his worldly wisdom to the great law man of Gotham. Anne Hathaway is sultry, sexy and every bit the equal of 'Batman' as 'Selina Kyle'. Joseph Gordon-Levitt has long been an actor to watch and admire, and again he does admirable work as the cop off the street, somewhat hot-headed but determined that right should always prevail, a loner who sees similarities with the lonliness that follows 'Bruce Wayne'. Tom Hardy has probably the hardest job of all, how to convey emotions behind just a big mask, but he does a really stunning job, the voice is haunting, his bulk is quite something, but it is the eyes, he gives his performance almost solely through the eyes of his character and does so brilliantly. And of course there is Michael Caine who returns as 'Alfred' the long time butler of the Wayne Mansion. But he is so much more than that, and so is his performance. The love that 'Alfred' has for 'Bruce' is so beautifully conveyed in some very moving scenes.

As one would expect, the action comes thick and fast, and Nolan has really upped his game since "The Dark Knight", making great strides with his work using the IMAX cameras. They take the film to a whole new level. The action is pivotal to the film, and not just there for the sake of it, like some action films that we have seen earlier this year.
The photography is some of the best I have ever seen, and Cinematographer Wally Pfister will most ceratinly be nominated for an Oscar, and barring any major competition, deserves to win.
There is a thundering, rousing score from Hans Zimmer, that wonderfully accompanies the imagery on screen.
Some of the cast have already been mentioned, but it is rare to be able to say this, but there is not one poor performance in the entire cast. Everyone is at the top of their game, giving their best.

There are so many memorable scenes in the film, especially the destruction of an American Football pitch, also the first appearance of 'The Bat', and it all builds to a haunting and moving finale. With a running time of just under three hours, you never get bored, there isn't even any annoying scenes which Directors sometimes use to pad out the running time. Nolan has your 100% attention for the entire 164 minutes. And believe me, you will love every single minute of it.

Visionary British Director Christopher Nolan has come a long way since those early days of films like "Memento" and "Insomnia". He has long held this vision of 'Batman' and has wonderfully brought it to life, both with his amazing Direction, and his first class writing. This awesome trilogy that he has created will be watched for many years to come.

Going to the Cinema is about the experience, and if ever there is a film that HAS to be watched on the big screen, then it is "The Dark Knight Rises", and wherever possible I urge an viewers to see it on an IMAX screen, as it is an experience that you will never forget.

The legacy is complete......Bob Kane will be so proud......a well deserved 10 out of 10

"Magic Mike"

Mike works on a building site within the daytime. He also has a dream to take his hobby into a full time profession which is designing and building his own unique style of furniture. But he also has a secret. To fund his dream his building work does not provide enough money, so to increase his financial gain he works in a club in the evenings....as a male stripper.

Looking for work at the building site one day, is Adam, a young man looking to earn some cash. Mike takes him under his wing, and looks after him. When out for a drink, Mike sees that the ladies clearly take a shine to Adam, and he wonders whether he might be interested in some extra cash, in the same way that he does. So he goes to see his boss Dallas, who runs the male Strip troupe. They try Adam out on stage, and as expected he becomes a hit, both with the audience on film, and with the Cinema audience.

There are some well executed dance routines, all performed with great style by all the male cast members. Channing Tatum clearly at home, as this was an area of work he had been involved with before turning his hand to movies. The sight of Channing Tatum and Alex Pettyfer stripping on screen more than enough of a reason for this viewer to watch the film, which is very entertaining.

There is a but though. It is a film of two halves, the first half looking at the guys going their routines and seeing the fun that can had, and this is where a lot of the entertainment stems from. The second half sees a much darker time, with the success that Adam has, he ends up getting involved with drugs, and his character ends up on a slippery slope, and makes for a more sombre mood. If the film had either been solely for entertainment, or showing the dangers of what excess can bring then fine, but to try and combine the two, sadly it does not work.

Tatum and Pettyfer as strippers.....what more is there to say.....6 out of 10

"Ice Age 4: Continental Drift"

After the dire third film in the series, it was with some trepidation that I ventured to see sequel number three. Would it follow in the footsteps of its predecessor, or would it bring the franchise back from the dead?

I am pleased to say that the film is so good, it could even be my most favoured yet.

With the passing of time, the World as we know it, has started to take shape. And this means that the land masses are starting to move. And that the lands that our favourite jurassic creatures know and love are beginning to change. Naturally this means a whole new adventure for the motley crew.

The animation is faultess. The story is entertaining, and the laughs come thick and very fast, in this truly laugh out loud film. It may be ultimately aimed at the children, but forget that. If you like animation, and a really good belly laugh, then you could do far worse than watch this new release.

Far from the risk of extinction....this film is a monster hit.......8 out of 10

"Storage 24"

Charlie is having a pretty bad day. He has just been dumped by his girlfriend, he is at a loss as to know why. The film opens with him in a car with his friend, Mark, who is trying to console him, as they make their way to a storage facility. Charlie just wants to get his possessions back.
When they arrive at the unit, Charlie days gets worse, when he finds out that they are not alone. His ex-girlfriend had the same idea. Words are exchanged, and tempers are raised.

But that is nothing compared with what happens next.
A plane crashes not too far from where the Storage unit is, and it is clear that one thing on board did survive the crash. And it is not necessarily of this world. For it seems that the plane was transporting an extra terrestrial and now it is loose in London.
With the plane having crashed, it has caused a power loss in the area, so the storage unit has gone into automatic lock-down. And unfortunately for the people inside, the alien creature has now gained access.
Havoc soon follows as the humans team up to both find a why out of the facility and also to prevent themselves from being killed by the alien intruder.

As much as I adore Noel Clarke, who for me is one of the brightest talents within the British Film Industry, it has to be said that is not his greatest screenplay. Whether it is the writing or the performances or more likely a combination of both, the characters are pretty dull, you want to give them all a good slapping. They are not really brought to life, and so you don't care at all what happens to them.
It is pretty formulaic, it has been done before, and been done a lot better. The Direction from Johannes Roberts is very weak, providing little tension.
The effects in creating the alien creature range from ok to poor.

At the end of the day, you have to admire the intentions of the Director and Writer but maybe they set their goals a little out of their price range. Maybe spent a little longer writing the screenplay.

The saving grace of the film, though it was a case of too little too late for this viewer, is that it has a killer ending. Loved it.

Nice idea......but lacked on delivery.......4 out of 10

"The Amazing Spider-Man"

The famous web slinger is back in this new franchise from Sony.

But there are some big shoes to film. Director Sam Raimi had created a great legacy, bringing to life the world of Peter Parker.
So how would this new series of films fare?

Relative unknown Marc Webb is given the Director's chair, and does a first class job, both in telling the story, and also providing plenty to be entertained by.
The story sees Peter Parker trying to uncover the truth as to what happened to his parents, when they mysteriously left, leaving him with his Aunt and Uncle. During his investigation, it leads Peter to 'Oscorp' the Company his father was working for, and directly to the offices of Dr. Curt Connors. A scientist who is keen to reap the rewards of his research. A deformity leaves him with one fully working arm, and he aims to see both his arms restored to full glory. But his obsession comes at a price. Using the restorative genetics of a lizard, he injects himself, and sure enough his arm is back, but other aspects of the genes work themselves into his system, and before long he is transformed into a raging lizard, rampaging through the city.

With such a vital lead character at the heart of the film, you have to find the right lead actor to play that role. There were several questions asked when it was announced that Andrew Garfield was taking over from Tobey Maguire, as to his suitably. I for one would never question his acting skills. His talent is obvious, and I felt he would bring a new dimension to Peter Parker, and this he truly does. Maguire was good, but for me this is totally Andrew Garfield's gig. He can do the nerd, the humour, the action, the romance, and he is a bloody good actor.
Emma Stone, who is becoming quite the young lady of Hollywood is equally suited to her love interest role as 'Gwen'. Whether she will make way for Mary Jane remains to be seen.

In the original film, Cliff Robertson did such a wonderful job, as 'Uncle Ben'. And it would be difficult to imagine anyone else in the role, but thankfully the Creative Team behind the film have an ace up their sleeve, in that they get Award winning actor Martin Sheen to take over the role. Such a consumate professional, Sheen brings the same kind of humanity to the role that he did when working his magic playing 'President Bartlet' in "The West Wing". And also equally nice to see Sally Field back on the big screen after an absence of several years.

The action scenes are wonderfully directed, both visually stunning and plenty to keep one amused. The reintroduction of the Peter Parker character is handled very well in both writing and the performance from Andrew Garfield. Great to see the film on the IMAX but alas the 3D, as usual, does not add a great deal to the film.

On the whole, I would say that the future of Parker and Co. is very bright........8 out of 10.

"Prometheus"

Every so often, along comes a special film, what I like to call an 'event' film. Being such a fan of the "Alien" franchise that I am, it was only natural that I would be majorly looking forward to this film, especially with having 'Alien' Director Sir Ridley Scott back at the helm.

So what do we have to expect from "Prometheus"?
We see life on Earth, or rather its very creation. Then we jump to the future, not too far, and a team of Scientists happen upon a cave, and within is a drawing, having been there some considerable time. It turns out that the same pattern is turning up in cave systems all over the planet. They eventually work out that it relates to a star system. Could this be the key to the very foundation of life on Earth? Is there where our humble beginnings started?

The crew set off on a journey, on board the Prometheus. Once settled on the Planet, they start a survey of the area. They come across a cave system, and it looks remarkably like something we may have seen before. They find some cannisters, almost egg shaped. What could be inside? The team get seperated, and two members are left in the cave system. Unfortunately things do not pan out too well for these crew members. And things in general do seem to take a turn for the worse.
One of the Crew members is David, and he is an android, and seems to have a hidden agenda. Have we been here before I ask myself?

Whether you class this as a prequel to the Alien franchise is one for each individual viewer to decide. Personally I think it is, but it is hardly in the same league as the 1979 masterpiece.
The plot is very sloppy, at times very predictable. Although Ridley Scott has assembled some great names to appear in the film, very few come away with any high marks.  Worst of all has to be Oscar winner Charlize Theron, if the Acadamy asked for their Oscar back, I would not blame them.
Noomi Rapace  and Michael Fassbender do fair better in their respective roles.
One cannot argue that the film is visually stunning, but this does not compensate for where else the film is lacking.

For such a huge build up, this film majorly failed to deliver, there were a lot of unanswered questions, presumably to lead to a sequel, but ultimately what was it all for? A real shame......5 out of 10

"Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter"

A reworking of history maybe....as I don't seem to recall that to enter the White House, one had to be a slayer of the undead. But who knows, maybe this is a hidden aspect of Lincoln's character that the history books have yet to find out about.

The story concerns a young Lincoln, who's mother is killed by a Vampire. From this young age, Lincoln vows to avenge the death of his mother. He becomes popular and well liked in the local town, and his best friend Will is African American, surely a sign of things to come.

From working in a humble shop, Lincoln becomes interested in Politics, but still trying to rid his beloved Country of the neck biting scum. It is during one of these slayings that he meets the enigmatic Henry, a man who will teach Abraham a great deal in the killing of Vampires. But is Henry all that he seems to be?

But Jack Barts, the Vampire responsible for the death of Lincoln's mother is merely the tip of the iceberg. There is a whole Vampire Family, and the head of the family is Adam, who is keen to see Vampires rule over all. And Abraham, with some help from Henry will do all he can to overcome them. The battle maybe greater than Lincoln anticipated, as Adam is using the Confederates to increase the size of his Army. Perhaps there was more to the Civil War than we first thought. The battle between Man and Vampire builds to the inevitable finale......who wins?  That would be telling.

I rather enjoyed this movie, something a little different. Don't get me wrong, the story is complete tosh, but if you take it at face value, and expect nothing more than to be entertained then you may find it favourable. Visually it is very impressive, including a fight on a steam train going over a collapsing bridge, which just about destroys every law of gravity.

Don't take it seriously, sit back and be entertained, as it's good escapist fun.........6 out of 10

"Red Lights"

Margaret Matheson is an expert in the field of psychic phenomena. Both she and her assistant, Tom Buckley visit Mediums, Psychics, and debunk what the mystics claim to be as their special powers. Tom is always on the lookout for red lights, the little something that gives away the fact they are fake. Between the two of them they have become quite a formidable team.
The film opens quite nicely with them visiting a possible poltergeist in a house, and then they visit a Medium performing on stage. Naturally with their combined efforts, they proof that here is another fake at work.
They have a lab set up with a local university, which is where a lot of there work is conducted. They also have to contend with bureacracy at the University, struggling with funding etc.

Then they are faced with the ultimate psychic investigation. A world famous Blind psychic, Simon Silver, is returning to the stage after an absence of some 20 years. He left the limelight, when his last show ended with disasterous results. For Tom this is an opportunity that he cannot turn down, the chance to debunk one of the greatest Psychics to set foot on the stage.  However, Matheson is strongly against it, she argues that she tested Silver some years ago, and that he passed all the tests. But this is the chance of a lifetime for Tom, so he sets the wheels in motion.
But naturally Silver is reluctant to take part, could his act be revealed as a fake, or is he genuine and wants to keep the mystery a secret? Is there something more sinister behind his powers?

The scene is set for the battle between relative novice Psychic Investigator and one of the leading Psychics of our time.
During the journey to the showdown, some rather unexplained and unusual things start to happen. Could it be that Silver's power really is as strong as they say? 

There are some wonderfully played moments, at times quite chilling, and they succeed in getting the hairs on the back of your neck to stand. There really succeed in setting the tone of the film. With this film, in that nothing is 100% as it seeems, you do start to wonder whether Silver's claims are genuine. Obviously I will not reveal anything here, but it is a worthy end to the film.

All the cast are excellent in their respective roles. Sigourney Weaver has finally been given a decent role, she plays Matheson with an almost maternal love for Tom. Her own Son is hospitalized, so I guess he is the next best thing. Clearly he is someone she cares a great deal for, and as said, she plays the role really well.
Murphy is as reliable as ever. And De Niro plays the role of Silver with the right amount of mystery and menace as required. He does get a little hammy towards the end, but I did not mind, as the build up of a journey was well worth it.
I cannot say much more about the ending of the film without giving anything away. But I thoroughly enjoyed it, nicely played out with a great cast, and there was excellent direction from Rodrigo Cortes.

Great movie, that really keeps you guessing til the end......8 out of 10

"Fast Girls"

The timing of this movie is obviously very deliberate, what with the forthcoming London 2012 Olympics just a few weeks away.

Shania is clearly a talented runner, but does she have what it takes to go all the way to the International Championships?  Coach Tommy thinks she does and includes her in his team for both individual and team races. The majority of the team Shania gets on with, as they are from a similar background,  but there is Lisa, a young woman who was born with a silver spoon in her mouth, and is the apple of her Daddy's eye, a former medallist. Her father also has much sway over the team governing the Championships, basically what he wants, he gets, or rather his Daughter does. So when Lisa sees Shania as competition, she does her best to make life very difficult for her.

Will Shania have the aptitude to deal with the races and not allow Lisa to get in her way? Will it all become too much for her?
There are also some nice little side stories, including the mature athlete who has one final chance to get a Gold medal, there is also Carl, the team Physio, a former runner who lost his chance to win a medal and now looks after the team.

The story is nicely played, and builds to a finale at the International Championships. Writer Noel Clarke wanted to set the story at the 2012 Olympics, but the Olympic Governing Body would not allow him to use the Olypmics as a venue and also would not allow him to set the film during 2012. Understandably he was rather annoyed about this. But he does a nice enough job sharing the writing duties, and also with his performance as Coach Tommy. The film further illustrates why he is such a rising star within the British Film Industry, such a talented man he is.

All the cast acquit themselves admirably in their roles, Lenora Crichlow does well in her first major lead film role as Shania. Lily James is equally good as Daddy's girl Lisa. Phil Davis plays Brian who was Shania's original coach, and gives a great performance, beautifully done. Even 'Merlin' star Bradley James pops up as physio coach Carl, though not given a great deal to do, and it has to be said looking very tired.

A nicely timed film, that won't necessarily win gold, but has the potential to go all the way.....7 out of 10

"Men In Black 3"

The dynamic duo of Agents K and J are back, once again doing battle against a variety of alien beings.

All round nasty piece of work 'Boris The Animal' has escaped from a Prison located on the moon. Having made his way to Earth, he uses a device to time travel back to the Sixties, and change history, which involves his killing Agent K. The timeline is therefore altered, and Agent J is baffled as to why he cannot locate Agent K. Having discovered from new Department Head Agent O that K died 40 years ago, he realises that he must undertake the same journey as Boris but allow the original outcome to take place, so that K will be alive in the present day.
There are some other scenes involving their apprehending Aliens, and dealing with big blobby creatures which provide much humour in the film.
Also as ever there is an excellent level of both make-up and visual effects in the film. The 3D element is also quite decent.

Reprising their roles Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones are excellent as Agents J and.K. New additions to the team include Emma Thompson as Agent O, who does seem to include a love interest for Agent K. But by far the main new addition is Josh Brolin as the younger Agent K. He perfectly recreates the character of K, even down to a near perfect voice of Tommy Lee Jones.
There is a big finale which certainly delivers, and a nice little delve into the past history of both main characters which is beautifully done.

Having not been a fan of the original movie, and not having seen the second, I was pleasantly surprised as to how much I enjoyed this third film, and it shows there is plenty of life in the franchise yet........8 out of 10.

"Dark Shadows"

The US Television series from the 1960's gets a make-over, with the regular teaming of Director Tim Burton and lead actor Johnny Depp.

Collinsport is the ancestral home of Barnabas Collins and his family. Local girl Josette is in love with Barnabas, but also is his maid Angelique, and knowing that she cannot compete for his affections, she makes sure that no-one else can. For Angelique is a witch, and uses her powers so that Josette will take her own life. With his loved one gone, Barnabas knows he cannot go on without her, so aims to take his own life too, but before he can complete the act, Angelique strikes again, and damns him for all eternity by making him a Vampire.
Once the local town folk found out, and with a little help from Angelique, he realises that he is out of luck, and they bury him in a coffin, where he will spend the rest of his undead life.
Jump forward to the 1970's and a new development sees the coffin being dug up, and Barnabas has to adjust to life two hundred years ahead of when he was buried.

Playing the part of Barnabas Collins is Johnny Depp, and it is the kind of role that he slips into rather effortlessly, for him it is like wearing a pair of old slippers. He does provide the film with the majority of its humour.
Eva Green is good as Angelique, she makes a most admirable femme fatale.
As for the rest of the cast, they have varying degrees of success in their roles, the one who fairs tyhe best is Helena Bonham-Carter as Dr. Hoffman, a local shrink trying to coax the Son of the house, David, into a 'normal' life.

The main problem with the film is that it cannot decide whether it wants to be a gothic thriller or a comedy, and does not really succeed in either area. It is enjoyable enough, but several of the laughs are given away in the trailer.

Could have been better, but Depp saves the day.....6 out of 10.

"Ill Manors"

A Council estate in London, where naturally live is tough...very tough. There are drug dealers around every corner, young girls sell themselves just to survive, and young men armed with guns trying to be the next main man in the area.

Aaron lives his life day by day, trying to survive on the streets. His best friend Ed has just been released following being arrested for drug offences.
Also we have Kirby, an older drug dealer who takes great joy in belittling new boy Marcel for dealing on his patch. Marcel aims to get his own on back on Kirby, with a series of events that soon spiral out of control.
There is also the couple who run the local Pub, who are desperate for a baby, and through circumstances come into contact with the abandoned baby of a young prostitute mother who is on the run from Russian gangsters.

There are several story strands all presented at the start of the film, and we follow their progress, but the genius is watching as they slowly start to link with each other, in a writing style similar to that of Robert Altman or Quentin Tarantino. It makes for compelling viewing. There are some scenes which are quite uncomfortable to watch, for example young lad Jake is keen to make an impression, and is given the order to beat up his best friend, just to be accepted by a local gang. The boy is clearly torn between the loyalty of his best friend, and the need for wanting to belong.

I am not a fan of rap music but have to say that the film has a top notch soundtrack, mostly writtend and performed by Plan B.
Plan B is also known as Ben Drew, and he has both writing and directing duties on this film. In both cases it is his debut and what a phenomenal job he has done. Assembling a great cast to bring his awesome story to life. The photography is first class, as already mentioned he has a great soundtrack, and a film that will stay in the memory for some time to come.
All the cast are great in their roles, but one stand out has to be Riz Ahmed as 'Aaron', probably the one character in the film that has a chance of a decent life. The one sympathetic character, who whenever possible tries to do the right thing.

As a debut, films do not get much better than this. Ben Drew clearly has a talent, and hope that he continues to produce more top quality films like "Ill Manors". I have seen far more experienced Directors produce utter garbage compared to this masterpiece in film making.

Not pleasant viewing, but totally compelling, and an example of great talent......9 out of 10

"The Plague of the Zombies"

The clasic Hammer Horror film gets a wonderful revamp with this remastered version of the 1966 original.

A small Cornish village has seen the number of its town folk die, with a mysterious affliction that has befallen them.  London Doctor Sir James Forbes and his daughter go to the Village to visit some family friends. There he assists with local Doctor Tompson to try and discover what is the cause of the sickness.

Unbeknownst to them, a cult is running riot in the village, helmed by businessman and Squire Clive Hamilton. He is using voodoo magic to bring deceased villagers back to life, where they are used as slaves to operate a mine.

There are all the usual key ingredients that made Hammer Horror films so great, and essential viewing for the best part of 20 years. It was great to be given the opportunity to see it on the big screen, and being a fan of "Doctor Who", there are a number of familiar faces in the film. Given the level of make-up and affects nowadays, this may seem rather tame, but there is still plenty to enjoy, most notably that great scene when the zombies start to rise from their graves.

A nice effort from Hammer.......6 out of 10

"Jaws"

The film that gave rise to the term summer blockbuster is once again back on the big screen, to bring terror back to our Cinemas once more.
I have always wanted to see this classic on the big screen, and was very delighted to get the opportunity.

I doubt there are many who are unfamiliar with the story of "Jaws", but just in case......
We are in Amity, a small town which enjoys the sun-worshippers and bathers who enjoy the idyllic waters of Amity, and its friendly inhabitants. But the population has increased by one, and it comes in the form of a Great White Shark. Once body parts start to appear on the beach front, local Police Chief Martin Brody has to do battle not only with the Shark but also the local officials of the town, who aim to stop him from closing the beaches, afraid that it will affect the revenue it generates for the local businesses.
A bounty is issued for anyone who can catch and kill the Great White so the hunt is in.......

Despite being almost 40 years old, the film has lost none of its brilliance. From those opening scenes where the first swimmer becomes victim to the Shark, where set off on a journey, one that still shows the genius of Spielberg as a Director. Some stunning photography, great editing, and that world famous score by John Williams, that all contribute to a film that still entertains and enthralls.

Spielberg assembled a superb cast for the movie, we have Roy Scheider as Police Chief Brody, a man who is weary of the water, there is also Richard Dreyfuss as Matt Hooper, an expert from Oceanographic Society, who skills will be used to track down the shark. Then there is Robert Shaw. Of the three main leads, it is Shaw who steals the show as Quint, a one man army, who will do battle with the Shark, very much like Ahab and Moby Dick. His performance is a real highlight of the film, those now legendary scenes where Quint recalls being on board the Indianapolis leave you glued to the screen.

For two solid hours the viewer is completely engrossed in this story of man against shark, a real classic that still wonderfully stands the test of time, and will continue to delight film viewers for many years to come.........9 out of 10

"The Raid"

A major gangster is holed up in a 30 storey building, a building filled with his tennants and also a number of his gun wielding associates. On their way to the building is a group of 20 Elite officers, determined to take down the main man.

The film has some of best action sequences ever put on film, and they come thick and fast. As the officers try to take floor by floor, they come up against a variety of gangsters armed with an array of weapons. They certainly have to be on their guard.
There is a semblence of a story, we see the younger officers, those who have families, will they ever make it home to their loved ones?  Are the officer who has a Brother in the upper ranks of the Gangsters hierachy. There is the older member of the elite force who may not be all that he seems.

It is a case of sit back, relax and enjoy the ride.......7 out of 10

"The Dictator"

That subtle film maker Sacha Baron Cohen is back, this time with a parody about a Middle East Dictator. I cannot imagine where he gets his inspiration from.

General Aladeen is a ruthless leader, and he is under pressure to appear before the United Nations to reform his country, which will give his people a better way of life. Naturally there are those close to him are are not that keen for this to happen.
An assassination attempt leaves Aladeen spooked, so he finds someone who bears a passing resemblence to him, and they become his body double.
Once in the States he finds himself without his trademark beard, and his double is working for his military Chief, who wants Wadiya to remain a dictatorship. So Aladeen is alone in a foreign country with no money, and no-one to believe he is the real leader of Wadiya.

Despite what I have said, I am probably not painting it as the funny film that it is. There are many laughs in the movie, also as one would expect, there is a lot of crudity, yes some of it is funny. As another reviewer put it, in this world where the Politically Correct bunch have run riot, it is refreshing to find a writer / performer like Baron Cohen who is not afraid to push boundaries...just look at the stunt he pulled at the Academy Awards earlier this year.

Anyone who has watched his previous films, they may find this one a little safe, as it does stay a tad more main stream, especially at the end. But it is still worthwhile viewing, especially with the moving memorial dedication at the beginning to the film to a passed world leader.

An improvement on past Cohen films....watch and enjoy......7 out of 10

"The Avengers Assemble"

After a plethora of films are featuring a variety of Marvel comic characters, now we have the Daddy of them all....the World becomes threatened by a force so evil, that one Super Hero will be insufficient against the power of what is to come.
S.H.I.E.L.D. boss Nick Fury gets his mobile out and calls up all the greatest Super heroes to do battle against Loki (rather pissed off God from "Thor") and his Army. One or two of them are a little reluctant to participate, but with a little gentle persuasuion, they soon form their merry band.

The film is split into two halves, the first being the recruitment of the super-heroes and the attacks by Loki, and second being the fight back by the Marvel Army.
As one would expect from this film there are plenty of action scenes and many explosions, the story pretty much takes second fiddle to the visual effects and the action scenes. The story merely serves the purpose of having an excuse to bring the Marvel Characters together. So don't go expecting some Oscar Winning literary masterpiece with the writing.

With a running time of almost two and a half hours, the film does an admirable job of keeping you entertained. It has to be said that after such a great 3D conversion with "Titanic" that I felt that the 3D effect on this film was disappointing.
The film is a little light on good laughs, but there are two really great laugh out loud moments, and are almost worth the price of admission alone.
As said, the film is about seeing these great characters come together, after we have seen their individual stories. It is also about the visual effects which are some of the best on screen. For such a high level of effects, I am amazed that it cost only $220 million.

A good movie, not outstanding, but still highly enjoyable, some of the Marvel stand alone films fair better......7 out of 10

"Piranha 3DD"

Those pesky nipping fish are back. Just when you thought it was safe to watch a decent film at the Cinema, then along comes "Piranha 3DD".

Since the abandonment of the town that was terrorised in the original movie, those man eating fish need to get their food supply elsewhere. And they happen upon a newly opened Water Park, is that the dinner gong I hear ringing?

This film lacks the great sexual innuendo, the laughs and at times gruesome make-up that made the first film so entertaining. Even an appearance from the finest of "Baywatch" cannot rescue this film from sinking.

It is merely ok, and lacks any real bite.....4 out of 10

"American Reunion"

The boys and girls are back for their School Reunion, and as ever the antics come at the screen thick and fast.

It is the first time that the original cast from the first movie have all gotten back together, and it makes for an enjoyable film. I was not a major fan of the two sequels, but seeing the likes of Jim, Oz, Finch and Sifler all back together was too tempting.

For a comedy it is not high on laughs, and it is not as crude as some of the previous movies, though that being said, what is nice is seeing them all come together for their Reunion, which this viewer can relate to, having organsied a small reunion himself.

 If you are looking for a movie to match the standards set by the first three films then you may come away disappointed....6 out of 10

"Salmon Fishing In The Yemen"

Another best selling novel hits the big screen, with this tale of a rich Arab, who has discovered his love of Salmon fishing whilst on holiday in the UK. He feels that with enough of his own finances, and the resources of the fishing experts of the UK, he can fulfil his dream of being able to Salmon fish in his own back yard...literally.

Here arrives Emily Blunt and Ewan McGregor playing Harriet and Alfred, the UK experts given the task of realising the dream of the Arab Prince, and then putting it into practice. Alfred is reluctant to have any involvement in the ludicrous scheme, but eventually he changes his mind, and gets fully involved, especially when he forms a stronger friendship with Harriet. They both are suffering with relationship issues, Alfred is constantly at odds with his wife, as they never seem to spend more than a few hours in each others company. And poor Harriet has just met the man of her dreams, when he has to go off to Afghanistan to fight for Queen and Country, and after being there only a few weeks is missing presumed dead.

The scheme is deemed proposterous at first, but then with a little persuasion from the Government, it is looked into, and could be possible. The UK ministers are keen to further relationships with the Arab Prince. The Government is mainly represented by Patricia Maxwell, a no nonsense Minister who scares the bejesus out of anyone who comes within a five mile radius of her.
The Prince does have his problems however, as some dissidents in his country object to him spending millions just to enjoy fishing when others in his country are poor. They take matters into their own hands.

The affection between Alfred and Harriet grows stronger, that is until, Harriet's boyfriend returns from Afghanistan alive and well, and the all conquering hero. Cue Patricia Maxwell and hordes of reporters. Will Alfred and Harriet live happily ever after? Will she go back to Blighty with her military man?

All in all it is a nice enjoyable film, it will not win any major awards, but given some of the dross that I have had to endure recently, it makes for a refreshing change. Despite nice performances from both McGregor and Blunt, it is Kristen Scott Thomas as no nonsense Maxwell who steals the show. Her performance in fantastic, and highly amusing.

A nice little distraction from the mundane business of life.......6 out of 10

"Silent House"

Something of a rarity is this latest film, a thriller shot in real time, alledgedly in one continuous take. A young woman goes to visit a family house, out in the sticks, before it is put on the market with her Father and Uncle.
After only being there a few minutes, strange things start to happen. She sees figures lurking, and all three members of the family are attacked. All does eventually become clear as to what the cause is...but quite frankly you will find that you do not give a flying f**k by the end of it.
The slogan of the film is "Real Fear....In Real Time". Well the real fear is how the hell this film was commissioned, as it will almost certainly be in my Top Ten of the worst films of the year.

Elizabeth Olsen gives an absolutely dire performance in the lead role. She does nothing for the argument of stronger roles for women, quite the opposite in fact.
The main selling of the film has been that it was shot in one take.....what utter crap. It is quite clear that the film was shot in segments and then edited to give the appearance of a one take film. Even a novice could spot where the edits are made...

A silent cinema more like, due to empty seats......3 out of 10

"Mirror, Mirror"

Whether it be Asteroid movies, or volcano movies or even movies about 'Snow White', they are like buses, you don't get one for ages, and then two come along at the same time.
But first to the posts is "Mirror, Mirror" as this children's classic is retold for the Cinema Screen.

It is the traditional story for the most part, with the odd tweak and alteration here and there. Yes there are 'giant' dwarves in the film, a talking mirror, Prince Charming, all the key ingredients that made the book such a classic, alas the same cannot be said for the film.

Wicked Julia Roberts' Evil Queen is doing her best to make life sheer hell for Snow White. Both encounter Prince Charming, and have the hope of making him their own. One of them will be unlucky.The local town folk are starving, and in the woods near the castle live not only the thieving dwarves but also a monsterous beast.
The main difference with this film version is that Snow White does not spend a good portion of the latter part of the film asleep, waiting for a kiss from Prince Charming, she is more of a kick ass type of girl, and it is she giving the kiss to Prince Charming to break him from a spell.

Does everyone live happily after?  Well sadly not for this viewer. as the film was bland, dull, boring, and poorly made. The saving grace was a beautiful Julia Roberts clearly having a blast as the Evil Queen. Lily Collins was just about tolerable as Snow White, Nathan Lane was woefully underused, and given some below par material to work with. And the less said about Armie Hammer the better, as he has to rank as the most useless, one dimensional uncharming Prince Charming in movie history.
The colourful costumes were beautiful to look at, and a testament to the great work of the late Oscar winner Eiko Ishioka.

Mirror mirror on the wall, will I enjoy this film at all?.......am afraid not........4 out of 10